Blackjack experts have a fit with truth

While dealing craps in the late 1970's at Reno/Lake Tahoe casinos was fun, sometimes dealing blackjack was forced upon craps dealers. Blackjack players blame the dealer for losing while the shooter takes the wrath at the craps table. Today, some blackjack players are still miserable and wind up card counting by learning on internet sites. A grouch called QFIT (Norm Wattenberger) pushes card counter software that can cost hundreds of dollars and is allowed to spam on blackjack sites. A dinosaur named Don Schlesinger does not know the difference between a lunch counter and a card counter is "respected" on blackjack message boards. This dynamic duo has led thousands of wannnabe card counters to slaughter who use ace-reckoned counts such as the hi-lo count in the movie "21" and resistance is met with slander.

The readers of this Casino Examiner blog know the truth and they are set free, if they choose. In the 1966 edition of Edward O. Thorp's "Beat The Dealer", Julian Braun admitted to not taking out the 7,8,9's while taking out 2,3,4,5,6's in his computer work regarding the High-Low count. The overlay of 7,8,9's causes the dealer to bust more often and our double downs on 10/11's are improved. This error by Braun in the amount of percentage added to the card counter is not stated by him or by the "trillions" of sims by others since his admission. I'd bet it is more than a "slight error".

The mean spirited Schlesinger (the dinosaur) wrote on advantageplayer.com, "You're delusional. Braun admitted the error, corrected his work, and, everyone on planet earth moved on, except you, who are living in the Stone Age. Do you think that today's software and methodologies are perpetuating Braun's mistake, or do you think that, 30 years later, we have learned to do it correctly. I'm wasting my time writing this, but you need to go away and crawl back into your hole."
Don

Writing from the bunker here at Casino Examiner and giving headaches to the established card counter world is satisfying since mathematics is our dogma. So when a "respected" 21 expert is caught with his hand in the cookie jar, insults over substance rule the day.

Wattenberger/QFIT also has a fit when the hi-lo count is challenged by your Casino Examiner by saying on advantageplayer.com, "As for the math, it has been explained to you hundreds of times, and you have posted this exact same message hundreds of times. That's why you keep getting barred from sites. Not because of your false accusations of fraud, but because you keep posting the exact same message, over and over and over. Hundreds of times. We have read it. What is the point of posting something no one agrees with one more time?"

The Casino Examiner Moviemakerjjcasino YouTube site has received close to 200k views and some viewers agree with the message that the development of the established card counts such as Hi-Lo and KO are not as forthcoming as advertised. The accusation of posting the "exact message" hundreds of times is just another falsehood from the blackjack computer software spam king QFIT. The Casino Examiner is welcome on all blackjack sites except the site where QFIT peddles his Casino Verite software on Ken Smith's blackjackinfo.com message board. The truth is bad for QFIT's software business and slandering your Casino Examiner after receiving a headache from him is transparent to the readers of this blog.