Friday, July 1, 2011

Casino Examiner's JSTAT blackjack count



I am a blackjack card counter. I was a recovering hi-lo loser at 21 before I discovered my ten count 20 years ago. Yes, the same hi-lo count used by the suckers at MIT in the movie "21". The chumps at MIT went bankrupt according to the History Channel's "Breaking Vegas". My Ten Count (JSTAT Count) is an upgrade of Edward O. Thorp's Ten Count in "Beat The Dealer". I managed to be barred all over Nevada using my method. Betting with my head, not over it. I hope that you all use the count presented in the videos here on the Casino Examiner blog or the Moviemakerjjcasino YouTube site. No charge, it is free. You can brag to your friends and family about the fear the casinos will have of you if you play perfect.

I used combinational analysis and a calculator which is more accurate than computer sims. Using subsets really shows the power of the JSTAT Count over hi-lo. For example, we are playing two hands heads up at single deck. Our first hand is A,A and the second is A,9. The dealer shows an ace and asks for insurance. The hi-lo count is -4, not an insurable count . The JSTAT Count differs because taking insurance is a positive expectation event in this situation. +1 with four aces gone with less than 1/4 deck played takes about +3.5 and above to gain the insurance advantage. 4 aces and +1 equals +5, we take the insurance while the hi-lo player misses out and is clueless. We can use many subsets to prove the power of the JSTAT Count over hi-lo. The JSTAT Count is as good as the powerful Hi-OptII. It side counts the aces, eights, and nines, like Hi-OptII. It takes advantage of asymmetry situations from the side counts. Combinational analysis with subsets and a calculator was needed to confirm its power. Blackjack computer simulation is insufficient. The YouTube page has created an "underground railroad" of interested counters. I am giving you the important information that is not published and not seen in other YouTube videos. If the casino executives and book sellers who read Casino Examiner here believe that the JSTAT Count is "very weak, very weak", we will dominate. I got away with fooling Reno/Lake Tahoe for 6 years in the 90's because of the difference of my blackjack count from hi-lo and other counts. I am willing to take the blows by revealing the truth of card counting at 21.

1 comments:

  1. What I really like about the Hi-Lo strategy in blackjack game is its simplicity. In fact, due to this card counting system, top online casino sites fear blackjack teams when they have mastered and using it. Well, who would not fear over a strategy that works well? Be that as it may, I still find the counting part confusing sometimes and lead me shifting my odds without me even knowing.

    ReplyDelete